I’ve been hearing a lot of good things about Derwent watercolor pencils. After using the Derwent watercolor pencils for a few months, it’s time for a review.
About Derwent Watercolor Pencils
I purchased a set of 12 colors, along with a pad of Canson L’Aquarelle 140 lb hot press watercolor paper at Hobby Lobby. The pencils retailed at $25.99 and the paper at $24.99, but I used a 40% coupon on both items.
TIP: If you shop regularly at Hobby Lobby, go online and print their 40% off coupon. You can use it only once and it applies only to the most expensive item you buy (not the entire purchase,) but it’s a great way to get new supplies and a good deal.
Since I did most of my work on the watercolor paper, I’ll share my thoughts on that, as well.
Derwent Watercolor Pencils: My Review
Derwent packages their tins with a shrink wrap cover inside the tin, so you can remove the tin’s lid and see the pencils before you buy them. A very helpful feature if you buy retail from a brick-and-mortar store.
The pencils are stamped in easy-to-read silver, with color names and color numbers clearly visible. They come pre-sharpened, and with the approximate colors on the end of the pencil.
Approximate because they aren’t all 100% accurate. It’s a good idea to make color swatches to see the actual color once you buy the pencils.
Most of the pencils in my set were in excellent shape and ready to use. Only the Burnt Ochre broke when I sharpened it the first time, but that gave me an opportunity to test Derwent’s customer support process. My understanding before buying these pencils that the Derwent company is very quality conscious and is quick to replace defective stock.
I found that to be true. I emailed the company and told them about the set I’d purchased and the pencil with the broken pigment core.
True to expectation, they emailed me back within a few days and offered to replace the pencil if I wished. I could still use the pencil—yes, even the broken pigment core—so I didn’t ask for a replacement, but it’s good know they were so willing to help me.
Derwent is a British company, so they use the Blue Wool Scale for lightfast testing.
Two identical dye samples are created. One sample is placed in darkness and one in the equivalent of sunlight for three months. A standard test card is also put in the same lighting conditions and the samples are then compared.
Fading is rated on a scale of 0 to 8, with 0 being the poorest and 8 the highest. A rating of 8 signifies a color that doesn’t fade at all and can be considered permanent.
Of the twelve colors in the 12-pencil set, four have an “8” rating, one is rated “7”, two are rated “6,” and the other five are 5 or below. Most professional artists either don’t use any color rated 5 or less for fine art or they don’t sell the originals. Fading colors can be used to create artwork if all you plan to do is sell reproductions.
However, these ratings are all for dry pigment. They apply only if you don’t use water to activate the color.
Since the purpose of watercolor pencils is to use them wet, I set up my own lightfast test.
My Lightfast Test
I made a swatch of color for each of the pencils. Each swatch is labeled with the color name, the number, and the Blue Wool rating (in parentheses.) At the bottom of the page is information on the pencil, the paper, and the test I started the test.
This swatch shows the dry color.
Next, I activated half of each swatch with water.
This also gives you a good idea of how will the strokes disappear with a minimum of blending. I have found that strokes disappear entirely with a few more strokes of a wet brush, or if you use more water.
When the samples were dry, I covered the center portion with a piece of opaque paper and taped it in a south-facing window.
This is the result after four weeks. Dry pencil on the right, water-activated on the left. The only color that appeared to have faded at all was the Imperial Purple (rated 4,) and the fading wasn’t obvious. The fact of the matter is that the ball point pen I used to label the test faded far worse than the colors.
The 8-week check looked like this. I don’t know about you, but I didn’t see much difference. That was encouraging, to say the least.
Back into the window for the test sheet.
I checked them again at the 12-week mark and this is what I found.
There does appear to be some dulling of the color, but it’s not significant.
However, I need to make two points about my test.
One, it’s in no way scientific or conclusive. We had a lot of gray days this spring, so the exposure of the colors may not have been as strong as it could have been.
Two, I didn’t use very much water to activate the color. The more water you use, the more likely the colors are to become fugitive.
However, given my results, I’d have no difficulties using all of these colors (except maybe the 4-rated and less colors) for fine art if I didn’t plan to sell the original work.
Drawing with Derwent Watercolor Pencils
From the first stroke to the last, these pencils were a delight to use, even on a paper that I was previously unfamiliar with. Color goes on with ease, even with light pressure. They have a soft almost creamy feel when used dry. Not quite as soft as Prismacolor, but much softer than Faber-Castell Polychromos, for example.
They’re also fun to use when you apply color wet. I did a lot of work by wetting a brush, stroking the brush across the sharpened pencil, then brushing the color onto wet or dry paper.
Remember I mentioned that broken pigment core? I wasn’t too upset because pieces of pigment core can be dissolved in warm water to create liquid pigment. It’s a great way to blend colors before putting them on paper.
I’ve drawn several pieces on different types of paper. I’ve also used them wet and dry, and tried several different ways to use them wet. As I prepare this post for publication, I’m working on a sky and cloud study for a tutorial, so you can see how they perform in action.
What Do I Think of the Derwent Watercolor Pencils?
I’m a little disappointed so many of them are fugitive. The pencils are so easy to use dry and wet that it’s a shame five of them are too fugitive for my liking.
But that is the only strike I have against them.
Colors lay-down very smooth, the pencils are highly pigmented. The earth tones, blues, and greens are perfect for landscape and animal art, even in just the 12-pencil set.
Time will tell on the fade rate, but I have no objections to using all the colors for sketching and studies, and will be using the lightfast colors for finished pieces.
So if you want to try watercolor pencils, but don’t have a lot of money to spend, you can hardly go wrong with a small set of these.
And What about the Canson L’Aquarelle Paper?
I didn’t forget!
Most of the work I did with Derwent Watercolour Pencils was on Canson L’Aquarelle Watercolor Paper. I was as pleased with the paper as with the pencils. It’s very much like Stonehenge Aqua in feel, and performs pretty much the same way, too.
I bought 140lb hot press because it’s smoother than cold press watercolor paper, so is more suited to colored pencils. The 9×12 inch pad contains 25 sheets, so it’s about a dollar a sheet. I cut the sheets in half for my small works.
It would also be ideal for ACEO art, since it’s heavy enough to withstand the use of water.
The only thing I haven’t yet tried with it is dry drawing. As soft to the touch and smooth as it is, I have no doubts it will perform well for that application as well.
Two points. First remember Inktense are not watercolour pencils even though many refer to them as such. The clue is in the name INKtense . They do not behave the same as watercolours in that you can’t really layer or alter once they are dry. However, you can get stunning vibrant effects.
Secondly, there is a new format out this month of Inktense. It is in the form of a traditional palette of colour blocks. I am very tempted to buy and try them to comiare to the Injtense pencils I didn’t get in with.
Finally. It is I terstknf about the lightfast rating between dry and wet. I read this is a similar scenario of Caran d’Ache Supracolor ll as well. They have quite good ratings. That is until they are activated with water.
Thank you again for your latest offering. Always so down to earth.
Two good points. However, the review above is not for Inktense, which I have yet to try. It’s for Derwent’s Watercolour Pencils. Two entirely different products.
As far as I understand, all watercolor pencils and Inktense products are lightfast rated for dry use. None of the companies (that I know of) test their colors for lightfastness after they’ve been activated with water. I’m not sure why other than for the fact that artists can use a lot of water or just a little. It would be cost prohibitive to test lightfastness for all possible amounts of water used. At least that’s my take on things.
One thing I can say is that the more water you add, the less lightfast the colors are likely to be.
That’s one reason why I’d like to do an entire piece with watercolor pencils, then frame it so that part of it is protected from direct light, hang on my walls for a year or two, and see what happens.
So many things to try, so little time!
Thank you for reading and sharing your thoughts, Pauline.
Interesting information and quite involved! Thank you.
Thank you! I try to tell you things I like to hear from others who review products.
Interesting information. I have some watercolor pencils [brand?] I haven’t used yet but plan to. When I first got back into drawing and coloring about 9-10 years ago, I only had some Cra-Z-Art pencils. I did a memorial tribute drawing of a rural postal carrier who died in an automobile accident for a friend of his. Even with these cheap colored pencils I ended up either ‘dabbing’ them on my tongue or on a wet pad to help bring out the color. Well, this picture now is on a wall at another small town’s American Legion post where this man was a member of. They all said I did a great job. So I’m kind of proud of that. I guess my point would be that now that I’ve learned a bit more, I wonder how it would look had I used these Derwent’s Watercolour pencils.
Thank you for sharing!
All of us who have been drawing for any length of time have pieces we wonder about. I know I do.
It would be an interesting group challenge for each of us to select a piece and do it again, just to see how much we’ve improved.